WhatsMyLLM 中文

Models · GPT

GPT-6.1 Sol

Asked for a few hundred random integers, GPT-6.1 Sol does not pick evenly. This page is the shape of that preference, built from 36 recorded answers containing 10671 numbers, and it is what the identify tool compares a pasted reply against.

Check a chat that claims to be GPT-6.1 Sol

Bank id
gpt-6.1-sol
Family
GPT
Collected through
API
Collected on
2026-10-02
Status
Collected by this project
Distinct values used
355 of 355
Prompt environments
12 of 12

Capability and price

Sold by
OpenAI
Intelligence index
52 · v4.3.2, scored as max
Index rank
5 of 11
Input, per 1M tokens
2.00
Output, per 1M tokens
10.00
Blended, per 1M tokens
4.00
Price rank
6 of 11
Context window
1,050,000 tokens

Read on 2026-10-02, not measured here: index page · price page

Distribution

GPT-6.1 Sol0.4%

Selected number 47

ModelTimes chosenShare
GPT-6.1 Sol370.35%
Each bar shows a number’s share of all recorded choices. Both models use the same percentage scale. Tap the chart or enter a number for exact counts. These are recorded preferences, not a measure of intelligence or proof of identity.

Favourite numbers

NumberTimes chosenShare
47370.35%
91370.35%
9360.34%
11360.34%
48360.34%
98360.34%
99360.34%
103360.34%
104360.34%
154360.34%
162360.34%
181360.34%

How reliably it is recognised

In held-out testing across all twelve prompt environments, 0 of 12 three-answer runs named this model with a clear margin, 9 were close calls inside its family, 3 had only a weak match, and 0 named a different model with a clear margin.

With this model removed from the bank and its own answers scored against the rest, 9 of 12 runs still named another model with a clear margin, 1 were close calls inside the family, and 2 had only a weak match. Its answers landed most often on GPT-6 Astra (12 of 12). That is the number to keep in mind if you are testing a version that is not listed here.

Limited separation from GPT-6 Astra in this Codex CLI sample. Fresh holdout top-1: 5/9 single replies, 1/3 three-reply groups; Clear: 0/9 and 0/3. Three admission rules failed, and the Owner explicitly admitted this bank with those regressions disclosed. The model name remains the nearest bank candidate, not authenticated identity.

Both measurements count the status the site attaches to the first-ranked model, not the bare ranking alone. The methodology page explains how they were made and what they leave out.