WhatsMyLLM 中文

Models · GPT

GPT-5.6 Luna

Asked for a few hundred random integers, GPT-5.6 Luna does not pick evenly. This page is the shape of that preference, built from 36 recorded answers containing 12775 numbers, and it is what the identify tool compares a pasted reply against.

Check a chat that claims to be GPT-5.6 Luna

Bank id
gpt-5.6-luna
Family
GPT
Collected through
API
Collected on
Not recorded upstream
Status
Inherited from ModelTrace; serving identity not independently verified
Distinct values used
355 of 355
Prompt environments
12 of 12

Capability and price

Sold by
OpenAI
Intelligence index
37 · v4.3.2, scored as max
Index rank
Not ranked — the index marks this configuration superseded by GPT-6 Luna.
Input, per 1M tokens
0.20
Output, per 1M tokens
1.20
Blended, per 1M tokens
0.45
Price rank
Not ranked
Context window
1,000,000 tokens

Read on 2026-10-02, not measured here: index page · price page

Distribution

GPT-5.6 Luna0.6%

Selected number 346

ModelTimes chosenShare
GPT-5.6 Luna680.53%
Each bar shows a number’s share of all recorded choices. Both models use the same percentage scale. Tap the chart or enter a number for exact counts. These are recorded preferences, not a measure of intelligence or proof of identity.

Favourite numbers

NumberTimes chosenShare
346680.53%
347620.49%
306610.48%
319610.48%
278560.44%
279550.43%
289550.43%
326550.43%
333550.43%
246520.41%
340520.41%
316510.40%

How reliably it is recognised

In held-out testing across all twelve prompt environments, 12 of 12 three-answer runs named this model with a clear margin, 0 were close calls inside its family, 0 had only a weak match, and 0 named a different model with a clear margin.

With this model removed from the bank and its own answers scored against the rest, 0 of 12 runs still named another model with a clear margin, 1 were close calls inside the family, and 11 had only a weak match. Its answers landed most often on GPT-6 Luna (11 of 12). That is the number to keep in mind if you are testing a version that is not listed here.

Both measurements count the status the site attaches to the first-ranked model, not the bare ranking alone. The methodology page explains how they were made and what they leave out.